Here is a list of recommended literature:
2241481
recommended
items
1
0
author
asc
https://zeta-project.eu/wp-content/plugins/zotpress/
%7B%22status%22%3A%22success%22%2C%22instance%22%3A%22zotpress-c3ab5bde7b2076f91b52b6bd12a3df29%22%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22request_last%22%3A0%2C%22request_next%22%3A0%2C%22used_cache%22%3Atrue%7D%2C%22data%22%3A%5B%7B%22key%22%3A%22G49T7TYC%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2241481%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A1194126%2C%22username%22%3A%22dkltimon%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22Keli%20Du%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Fdkltimon%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Burrows%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222007%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EBurrows%2C%20John%2C%20%26%23x2018%3BAll%20the%20Way%20Through%3A%20Testing%20for%20Authorship%20in%20Different%20Frequency%20Strata%26%23x2019%3B%2C%20%3Ci%3ELiterary%20and%20Linguistic%20Computing%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%2022.1%20%282007%29%2C%2027%26%23x2013%3B47%20%26lt%3B%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqi067%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqi067%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%26gt%3B%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22All%20the%20Way%20Through%3A%20Testing%20for%20Authorship%20in%20Different%20Frequency%20Strata%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22John%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Burrows%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22This%20article%20describes%20the%20operation%20of%20two%20new%20tests%20of%20authorship%20and%20offers%20some%20results.%20Both%20tests%20rely%20on%20controlled%20contrasts%20of%20word-frequency%20and%20both%20exclude%20the%20very%20common%20words%2C%20which%20have%20been%20put%20to%20such%20good%20use%20in%20recent%20years.%20One%20test%20treats%20of%20words%20used%20with%20some%20consistency%20by%20a%20target-author%20but%20more%20sporadically%20by%20others.%20The%20second%20treats%20of%20words%20used%20sporadically%20by%20the%20target-author%20but%20not%20by%20most%20others.%20%28The%20inclusion%20of%20words%20that%20some%20other%20authors%20use%20avoids%20the%20strict%20constraint%20that%20has%20impoverished%20this%20form%20of%20evidence.%29%20In%20suitable%20cases%2C%20both%20tests%20prove%20very%20accurate.%20The%20fact%20that%20evidence%20of%20authorship%20can%20be%20detected%20in%20these%20three%20distinct%20frequency-strata%20helps%20to%20explain%20why%20such%20tests%20should%20work%20at%20all%20and%20so%20encourages%20the%20development%20of%20even%20better%20ones.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222007%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqi067%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fllc.oxfordjournals.org%5C%2Fcontent%5C%2F22%5C%2F1%5C%2F27.abstract%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%22IUKRIB7T%22%2C%22F4ZZHIDE%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222021-12-15T19%3A47%3A13Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22F2VKYUK3%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2241481%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A5206995%2C%22username%22%3A%22roettgermann%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Froettgermann%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Lijffijt%20et%20al.%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3ELijffijt%2C%20Jefrey%2C%20Terttu%20Nevalainen%2C%20Tanja%20S%26%23xE4%3Bily%2C%20Panagiotis%20Papapetrou%2C%20Kai%20Puolam%26%23xE4%3Bki%2C%20and%20Heikki%20Mannila%2C%20%26%23x2018%3BSignificance%20Testing%20of%20Word%20Frequencies%20in%20Corpora%26%23x2019%3B%2C%20%3Ci%3EDigital%20Scholarship%20in%20the%20Humanities%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%2031.2%20%282014%29%2C%20374%26%23x2013%3B97%20%26lt%3B%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqu064%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqu064%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%26gt%3B%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22journalArticle%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Significance%20testing%20of%20word%20frequencies%20in%20corpora%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Jefrey%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lijffijt%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Terttu%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Nevalainen%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Tanja%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22S%5Cu00e4ily%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Panagiotis%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Papapetrou%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Kai%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Puolam%5Cu00e4ki%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Heikki%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Mannila%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22Finding%20out%20whether%20a%20word%20occurs%20significantly%20more%20often%20in%20one%20text%20or%20corpus%20than%20in%20another%20is%20an%20important%20question%20in%20analysing%20corpora.%20As%20noted%20by%20Kilgarriff%20%28Language%20is%20never%2C%20ever%2C%20ever%2C%20random%2C%20Corpus%20Linguistics%20and%20Linguistic%20Theory%20%2C%202005%3B%201%282%29%3A%20263%5Cu201376.%29%2C%20the%20use%20of%20the%20%5Cu03c7%202%20and%20log-likelihood%20ratio%20tests%20is%20problematic%20in%20this%20context%2C%20as%20they%20are%20based%20on%20the%20assumption%20that%20all%20samples%20are%20statistically%20independent%20of%20each%20other.%20However%2C%20words%20within%20a%20text%20are%20not%20independent.%20As%20pointed%20out%20in%20Kilgarriff%20%28Comparing%20corpora%2C%20International%20Journal%20of%20Corpus%20Linguistics%20%2C%202001%3B%206%281%29%3A%201%5Cu201337%29%20and%20Paquot%20and%20Bestgen%20%28Distinctive%20words%20in%20academic%20writing%3A%20a%20comparison%20of%20three%20statistical%20tests%20for%20keyword%20extraction.%20In%20Jucker%2C%20A.%2C%20Schreier%2C%20D.%2C%20and%20Hundt%2C%20M.%20%28eds%29%2C%20Corpora%3A%20Pragmatics%20and%20Discourse%20.%20Amsterdam%3A%20Rodopi%2C%202009%2C%20pp.%20247%5Cu201369%29%2C%20it%20is%20possible%20to%20represent%20the%20data%20differently%20and%20employ%20other%20tests%2C%20such%20that%20we%20assume%20independence%20at%20the%20level%20of%20texts%20rather%20than%20individual%20words.%20This%20allows%20us%20to%20account%20for%20the%20distribution%20of%20words%20within%20a%20corpus.%20In%20this%20article%20we%20compare%20the%20significance%20estimates%20of%20various%20statistical%20tests%20in%20a%20controlled%20resampling%20experiment%20and%20in%20a%20practical%20setting%2C%20studying%20differences%20between%20texts%20produced%20by%20male%20and%20female%20fiction%20writers%20in%20the%20British%20National%20Corpus.%20We%20find%20that%20the%20choice%20of%20the%20test%2C%20and%20hence%20data%20representation%2C%20matters.%20We%20conclude%20that%20significance%20testing%20can%20be%20used%20to%20find%20consequential%20differences%20between%20corpora%2C%20but%20that%20assuming%20independence%20between%20all%20words%20may%20lead%20to%20overestimating%20the%20significance%20of%20the%20observed%20differences%2C%20especially%20for%20poorly%20dispersed%20words.%20We%20recommend%20the%20use%20of%20the%20t-test%2C%20Wilcoxon%20rank-sum%20test%2C%20or%20bootstrap%20test%20for%20comparing%20word%20frequencies%20across%20corpora.%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222014%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22en%22%2C%22DOI%22%3A%2210.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqu064%22%2C%22ISSN%22%3A%222055-7671%2C%202055-768X%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22http%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdsh.oxfordjournals.org%5C%2Flookup%5C%2Fdoi%5C%2F10.1093%5C%2Fllc%5C%2Ffqu064%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%22IUKRIB7T%22%2C%224MZ8ZP2B%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-07-03T07%3A55%3A37Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22BFMBZJ5T%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2241481%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A5206995%2C%22username%22%3A%22roettgermann%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Froettgermann%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Paquot%20and%20Bestgen%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222009-01-01%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3EPaquot%2C%20Magali%2C%20and%20Yves%20Bestgen%2C%20%26%23x2018%3BDistinctive%20Words%20in%20Academic%20Writing%3A%20A%20Comparison%20of%20Three%20Statistical%20Tests%20for%20Keyword%20Extraction%26%23x2019%3B%2C%20in%20%3Ci%3ECorpora%3A%20Pragmatics%20and%20Discourse%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%20ed.%20by%20Andreas%20H.%20Jucker%2C%20Daniel%20Schreier%2C%20and%20Marianne%20Hundt%20%28Brill%20%7C%20Rodopi%2C%202009%29%20%26lt%3Bhttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fdoi.org%5C%2F10.1163%5C%2F9789042029101_014%26gt%3B%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22bookSection%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Distinctive%20words%20in%20academic%20writing%3A%20A%20comparison%20of%20three%20statistical%20tests%20for%20keyword%20extraction%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Andreas%20H.%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Jucker%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Daniel%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Schreier%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Marianne%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Hundt%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Magali%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Paquot%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Yves%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bestgen%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22Most%20studies%20that%20make%20use%20of%20keyword%20analysis%20rely%20on%20log-likelihood%20ratio%20or%20chi-square%20tests%20to%20extract%20words%20that%20are%20particularly%20characteristic%20of%20a%20corpus%20%28e.g.%20Scott%20and%20Tribble%202006%29.%20These%20measures%20are%20computed%20on%20the%20basis%20of%20absolute%20frequencies%20and%20cannot%20account%20for%20the%20fact%20that%20%5Cu201ccorpora%20are%20inherently%20variable%20internally%5Cu201d%20%28Gries%202006%3A%20110%29.%20To%20overcome%20this%20limitation%2C%20measures%20of%20dispersion%20are%20sometimes%20used%20in%20combination%20with%20keyness%20values%20%28e.g.%20Rayson%202003%3B%20Oakes%20and%20Farrow%202007%29.%20Some%20scholars%20have%20also%20suggested%20using%20other%20statistical%20measures%20%28e.g.%20Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney%20test%29%20but%20these%20techniques%20have%20not%20gained%20corpus%20linguists%5Cu2019%20favour%20%28yet%3F%29.%20One%20possible%20explanation%20for%20this%20lack%20of%20enthusiasm%20is%20that%20statistical%20tests%20for%20keyword%20extraction%20have%20rarely%20been%20compared.%20In%20this%20article%2C%20we%20make%20use%20of%20the%20log-likelihood%20ratio%2C%20the%20t-test%20and%20the%20Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney%20test%20in%20turn%20to%20compare%20the%20academic%20and%20the%20fiction%20sub-corpora%20of%20the%20British%20National%20Corpus%20and%20extract%20words%20that%20are%20typical%20of%20academic%20discourse.%20We%20compare%20the%20three%20lists%20of%20academic%20keywords%20on%20a%20number%20of%20criteria%20%28e.g.%20number%20of%20keywords%20extracted%20by%20each%20measure%2C%20percentage%20of%20keywords%20that%20are%20shared%20in%20the%20three%20lists%2C%20frequency%20and%20distribution%20of%20academic%20keywords%20in%20the%20two%20corpora%29%20and%20explore%20the%20specificities%20of%20the%20three%20statistical%20measures.%20We%20also%20assess%20the%20advantages%20and%20disadvantages%20of%20these%20measures%20for%20the%20extraction%20of%20general%20academic%20words.%22%2C%22bookTitle%22%3A%22Corpora%3A%20Pragmatics%20and%20Discourse%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222009-01-01%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22978-90-420-2910-1%20978-90-420-2592-9%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fbrill.com%5C%2Fview%5C%2Fbook%5C%2Fedcoll%5C%2F9789042029101%5C%2FB9789042029101-s014.xml%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%222CZHD96W%22%2C%224MZ8ZP2B%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-07-03T08%3A07%3A10Z%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22key%22%3A%22QL54PUE9%22%2C%22library%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A2241481%7D%2C%22meta%22%3A%7B%22lastModifiedByUser%22%3A%7B%22id%22%3A5206995%2C%22username%22%3A%22roettgermann%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22%22%2C%22links%22%3A%7B%22alternate%22%3A%7B%22href%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.zotero.org%5C%2Froettgermann%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22text%5C%2Fhtml%22%7D%7D%7D%2C%22creatorSummary%22%3A%22Sch%5Cu00f6ch%22%2C%22parsedDate%22%3A%222018%22%2C%22numChildren%22%3A0%7D%2C%22bib%22%3A%22%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-bib-body%5C%22%20style%3D%5C%22line-height%3A%201.35%3B%20padding-left%3A%201em%3B%20text-indent%3A-1em%3B%5C%22%3E%5Cn%20%20%3Cdiv%20class%3D%5C%22csl-entry%5C%22%3ESch%26%23xF6%3Bch%2C%20Christof%2C%20%26%23x2018%3BZeta%20f%26%23xFC%3Br%20die%20kontrastive%20Analyse%20literarischer%20Texte.%20Theorie%2C%20Implementierung%2C%20Fallstudie%26%23x2019%3B%2C%20in%20%3Ci%3EQuantitative%20Ans%26%23xE4%3Btze%20in%20den%20Literatur-%20und%20Geisteswissenschaften.%20Systematische%20und%20historische%20Perspektiven%3C%5C%2Fi%3E%2C%20ed.%20by%20Toni%20Bernhart%2C%20Sandra%20Richter%2C%20Marcus%20Lepper%2C%20Marcus%20Willand%2C%20and%20Andrea%20Albrecht%20%28Berlin%3A%20de%20Gruyter%2C%202018%29%2C%20pp.%2077%26%23x2013%3B94%20%26lt%3B%3Ca%20href%3D%27https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.degruyter.com%5C%2Fview%5C%2Fbooks%5C%2F9783110523300%5C%2F9783110523300-004%5C%2F9783110523300-004.xml%27%3Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.degruyter.com%5C%2Fview%5C%2Fbooks%5C%2F9783110523300%5C%2F9783110523300-004%5C%2F9783110523300-004.xml%3C%5C%2Fa%3E%26gt%3B%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%5Cn%3C%5C%2Fdiv%3E%22%2C%22data%22%3A%7B%22itemType%22%3A%22bookSection%22%2C%22title%22%3A%22Zeta%20f%5Cu00fcr%20die%20kontrastive%20Analyse%20literarischer%20Texte.%20Theorie%2C%20Implementierung%2C%20Fallstudie%22%2C%22creators%22%3A%5B%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22author%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Christof%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Sch%5Cu00f6ch%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Toni%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Bernhart%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Sandra%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Richter%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Marcus%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Lepper%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Marcus%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Willand%22%7D%2C%7B%22creatorType%22%3A%22editor%22%2C%22firstName%22%3A%22Andrea%22%2C%22lastName%22%3A%22Albrecht%22%7D%5D%2C%22abstractNote%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fzenodo.org%5C%2Frecord%5C%2F1286944%22%2C%22bookTitle%22%3A%22Quantitative%20Ans%5Cu00e4tze%20in%20den%20Literatur-%20und%20Geisteswissenschaften.%20Systematische%20und%20historische%20Perspektiven%22%2C%22date%22%3A%222018%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22ger%22%2C%22ISBN%22%3A%22%22%2C%22url%22%3A%22https%3A%5C%2F%5C%2Fwww.degruyter.com%5C%2Fview%5C%2Fbooks%5C%2F9783110523300%5C%2F9783110523300-004%5C%2F9783110523300-004.xml%22%2C%22collections%22%3A%5B%22IUKRIB7T%22%5D%2C%22dateModified%22%3A%222023-07-03T08%3A05%3A44Z%22%7D%7D%5D%7D
Burrows, John, ‘All the Way Through: Testing for Authorship in Different Frequency Strata’, Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22.1 (2007), 27–47 <https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqi067>
Lijffijt, Jefrey, Terttu Nevalainen, Tanja Säily, Panagiotis Papapetrou, Kai Puolamäki, and Heikki Mannila, ‘Significance Testing of Word Frequencies in Corpora’, Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31.2 (2014), 374–97 <https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqu064>
Paquot, Magali, and Yves Bestgen, ‘Distinctive Words in Academic Writing: A Comparison of Three Statistical Tests for Keyword Extraction’, in Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt (Brill | Rodopi, 2009) <https://doi.org/10.1163/9789042029101_014>
Schöch, Christof, ‘Zeta für die kontrastive Analyse literarischer Texte. Theorie, Implementierung, Fallstudie’, in Quantitative Ansätze in den Literatur- und Geisteswissenschaften. Systematische und historische Perspektiven, ed. by Toni Bernhart, Sandra Richter, Marcus Lepper, Marcus Willand, and Andrea Albrecht (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018), pp. 77–94 <https://www.degruyter.com/view/books/9783110523300/9783110523300-004/9783110523300-004.xml>